Call Now
Image related to PARRIS Obtains $58,358,431 Slip & Fall Verdict - Largest in U.S. History

PARRIS Obtains $58,358,431 Slip & Fall Verdict - Largest in U.S. History

Free Consultation
PARRIS Law FirmNewsPersonal Injury

On May 21, 2024, a Los Angeles jury awarded a historic $58,358,431 verdict to a Palmdale technician who suffered serious injuries when he slipped on ice while performing electrical repairs on top of a train car. The judgment is the largest known slip-and-fall verdict in U.S. history.

PARRIS Partners Alexander R. Wheeler and Khail A. Parris represented the Plaintiff during the three-phase, six-week trial.

The Injury

According to the lawsuit, the 39-year-old Plaintiff was working for Altech Services, Inc., a railroad contractor that provides electrical services for businesses across Los Angeles County. In February 2016, the Plaintiff was working at a Kinkisharyo International train facility in Palmdale, California. Kinkisharyo employees told the Plaintiff to complete electrical work on top of a train within three short hours.

After climbing on top of the train, the Plaintiff took a few steps before slipping on water that had pooled overnight. His left foot slid forward and became lodged in a grouping of electrical wires on top of the train. The weight of his tool bag and wires around his shoulders pulled his body forward and down, hyperextending his left ankle and knee. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered a micro-fracture in his foot that would become much worse over time. The Plaintiff eventually required invasive foot surgery that developed into Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a neurological condition that involves long-term pain and inflammation following an injury.

In 2020, he underwent additional surgery for severe neck and back injuries caused by his fall. Multiple doctors and specialists determined that the Plaintiff would need significant ongoing treatment to manage his pain — including surgeries and a spinal cord stimulator, an implanted device that helps treat chronic pain.

The persistent and severe pain the Plaintiff has experienced since his fall continues to limit his ability to carry, lift, push, pull, twist, and bend. In combination with other ongoing symptoms, the pain prevented the Plaintiff from working.

The Lawsuit

Shortly after the Plaintiff’s fall in 2016, an employee at Kinkisharyo helped the Plaintiff file a worker’s compensation claim for his injuries. However, Kinkisharyo denied the Plaintiff’s claim, arguing he was an employee of Altech Services, not Kinkisharyo.

As a result, the Plaintiff hired PARRIS to file a personal injury lawsuit against Kinkisharyo.

The complaint alleged that the Plaintiff’s fall resulted from a longstanding pattern of mismanagement and negligence by Kinkisharyo. On the evening leading up to the incident, a Kinkisharyo foreman instructed employees to perform a water test on top of the train but did not make sure the surface was properly dried before the Plaintiff arrived.

According to the complaint, this Kinkisharyo foreman required employees to work at a pace so demanding that they often had to compromise workplace safety protocols.

Multiple Altech and Kinkisharyo employees testified that they previously complained about dangerously wet conditions on top of the trains. Employees also reported there was not enough overhead light at the train factory, making an already hazardous job even more dangerous.

The Trial

After filing his lawsuit, the Plaintiff offered to settle the case with Kinkisharyo multiple times. In March 2022, Plaintiff made an offer of $3,000,000. Kinkisharyo offered $752,000 before trial, which the Plaintiff rejected.

The case went to trial in Los Angeles in the spring of 2024 and was divided into three phases.

In the first phase, the jury unanimously rejected Kinkisharyo’s argument that the company, along with Altech, was the Plaintiff’s joint employer. The company argued that because it had an employer-employee relationship with the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was only allowed to seek relief for his injuries through the workers’ compensation system, not a lawsuit.

PARRIS attorneys argued to the jury that this stance contradicted what Kinkisharyo said years earlier when it first rejected the Plaintiff’s worker’s compensation claim: that the Plaintiff was not its employee. The jury agreed.

In the second phase, the parties disputed how the Plaintiff fell and whether it led to his injuries. They also refuted his diagnoses and the nature and extent of his damages.

The jury rejected all of Kinkisharyo’s arguments and found in favor of the Plaintiff — awarding him compensatory damages of $54,158,431.00.

The final phase assessed whether Kinkisharyo should pay punitive damages, which is an award that would punish and deter them from future unsafe practices. The jury agreed and awarded the Plaintiff an additional $4,200,000.

Contact PARRIS

The verdict is the result of the hard work PARRIS attorneys put into each and every case. Every employee has the right to work in conditions where their safety is taken seriously. Employees also have the right to seek compensation when they sustain injuries on the job, especially when the injuries are the result of an employer’s negligence.

PARRIS Law Firm has an outstanding track record of fighting on behalf of injured parties and getting them the results they deserve. If you or a loved one has been injured through no fault of your own, contact PARRIS for a free consultation.

Here are more articles related to the same topic

Tell us how we can help.

If you need immediate assistance, please call our office at (661) 441-3989 and ask to speak with someone in our Intake Department available 24/7.

Alex and Adriana

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy and you are providing express consent to receive automated communications including calls, texts, emails, and/or prerecorded messages.